THE EFFECT OF LOAN PORTFOLIO METHODS ON LAON DELIQUENCY IN MICROFINANCE INSTITUTION IN CAMEROON (CASE STUDY BAMENDA II)
Project Details
The custom academic work that we provide is a powerful tool that will facilitate and boost your coursework, grades and examination results. Professionalism is at the core of our dealings with clients
Please read our terms of Use before purchasing the project
For more project materials and info!
Call us here
+237 670787771
Whatsapp
+237 670787771
OR
| Department | BK |
Project ID | BK100 |
Price | 10000XAF |
| International: $40 | |
No of pages | 80 |
Instruments/method | QUANTITATIVE |
Reference | REGRESSION |
Analytical tool | YES |
Format | MS word & PDF |
Chapters | 1-5 |
Lending is the primary business activity for most financial organizations. The loan portfolio is often the greatest asset for microfinance firms and is the most common source of revenue. According to Boateng (2011). The loan portfolio is often the greatest asset for microfinance firms and is the most common source of revenue. In the United States, effective credit risk management of the loan portfolio necessitates that the board of directors and management understand and oversee the bank’s risk profile and credit culture. To do so, they must have a solid understanding of the portfolio’s makeup as well as its inherent risks (Matovu & Okumu, 2013). For decades, good loan portfolio managers have focused their efforts on properly authorizing loans and closely monitoring loan performance. Despite the fact that these operations remain the backbones of loan portfolio management, prior credit problems, such as those linked with oil and gas lending, agricultural lending, and commercial real estate lending in the 1980s, have shown that portfolio managers should do more (Laurence, 2013).
The major goal of microfinance is the provision of microloans to the low-income and the poor households (Bystrom, 2007). The chance that a microfinance institution (MFI) may not receive its money back from borrowers (plus interest) is the most common and often the most serious vulnerability in a microfinance institution. Since most microloans are unsecured, delinquency can quickly spread from a handful of loans to a significant portion of the portfolio. This contagious effect is exacerbated by the fact that microfinance portfolios often have a high concentration in certain business sectors. Consequently, many clients may be exposed to the same external threats such as livestock disease outbreak and bad weather. These factors create volatility in microloan portfolio quality, heightening importance of controlling credit risk. In this regard, MFIs needs a monitoring system that highlights repayment problems clearly and quickly, so that loan officers and their supervisors can focus on delinquency (repayment rate) before it gets out of hand. In lending services, a default is the failure to pay back a loan. A loan is delinquent when a payment is late (CGAP, 1999).
Delinquent loans are also called impaired loans or non-performing loans (NPL). A loan is delinquent if payments or installments of the loan are delayed or overdue by a certain number of days. The time limit is usually 90 days, as often used by banks and financial institutions. So NPLs are those loans for which the principal and/or interest payments are in arrears by at least 90 days. Subsequently, if one or more installments are never repaid, the loan becomes default. But delinquent loans do not always go into default. For instance, Athreya, Sánchez, Tam and Young (2018), in their study on consumer debt delinquency, observe that 85% of borrowers, who are late on payments by 2-3 months, pay during the next quarter, and 40% reduce their debt. Sharma and Zeller (1997), in their analysis on group-based microcredit programs, also opine that most of the arrears are eventually paid, albeit late. Even if the loans do not necessarily turn into default, delinquency adversely affects the financial performance of banks and other lending institutions.
A delinquent loan becomes a defaulted loan when the chance of recovery becomes minimal. In microfinance group lending model is one of the best practices in Africa (Schreiner, 2003). The MFIs lends to self-help groups (SHGs) which on lends to the group members. This suggests that group governance including self-internal regulations and screening process for members for loan qualifications, may affect loan delinquency levels of the lending MFI. MFIs and SHGs operate under the influence of external factors such as macroeconomic factors which are beyond their control. This implies that in absence of quality governance and strategic plans aimed at mitigating adverse effect of external factor on credit risk, may contribute to high levels of delinquent loans.
In Europe, in the view of Nwankwo (2000), “credit constitutes the largest single income earning asset in the portfolio of most financial institutions. This explains why banks spend enormous resources to estimate, monitor and manage credit quality”. This is understandably, a practice that impact greatly on the lending behavior of banks and other financial institutions as large resources are involved. In UK, Chodechai (2004) while investigating factors that affect interest rates, degree of lending volume and collateral setting in the loan decision of banks, says: Banks have to be careful with their pricing decisions as regards to lending as banks cannot charge loan rates that are too low because the revenue from the interest income will not be enough to cover the cost of deposits, general expenses and the loss of revenue from some borrowers that do not pay (Chodechai, 2004).
In Africa, in most of the developments that improve the loan portfolio’s liquidity have implications for price risk. Traditionally, the lending activities of most banks in Ghana were not affected by price risk. Because loans were customarily held to maturity, accounting doctrine required book value accounting treatment. However, as banks develop more active portfolio management practices and the market for loans expands and deepens, loan portfolio has become increasingly sensitive to price risk (Nnanna, 2005).The banking industry has suffered massive losses over the last decade. Firms that had been performing well suddenly announced large losses due to credit exposures that turned sour, The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) pointed out what it terms “imprudent loan portfolio
management practices” as being one of the major causes of the banking crisis of 2004. Commercial banks have nearly uniformly upgraded their loan portfolio management and control systems as a result of this (Gieseche, 2004). Portfolio theory provides a foundation for understanding the interaction of systemic risk remand in Ugandan financial institutions. It has influenced how institutional portfolios are managed and encouraged the adoption of passive investment strategies. As more and more organizations move toward a management by projects approach, portfolio management is being used in a variety of other fields, particularly project management (Okorie al., 2007). Microfinance institutions are an important instrument for boosting financial inclusion and alleviating poverty in developing countries
The financing of sustainable development of MFIs is clearly deficient when levels of loan delinquency remain high. Despite the fact that MFIs use various techniques of screening borrowers, the level of delinquent loan keeps on increasing. For instance, the stock of delinquent loans in self-help groups expanded from 7.17% in 2008 to 28.22% in Kerugoya district in Kenya while for individual borrowers default increased from 2.21% in 2009 to 4.44% end of 2010 (Pamoja, 2010). In Bolivia loan delinquency increased by an average of 4% (i.e. from less than 5% to almost 9%) over 1999-2001 while by 2002 delinquency rose to 17% (Dinos & Ashta, 2010). Internationally MFI portfolio delinquency levels began to deteriorate rapidly, with loans past due over 30 days (portfolio at risk) jumping from a median of 2.2 percent to 4.7 percent in June 2009 (CGAP, 2010). loan delinquency hinders financial access facilitation to the microfinance client and may negatively affect the level of private investment; constrain the scope of MFIs credit to borrowers through reduction of MFIs’ capital, and accumulation of losses to compensate for loan losses. Indeed, loan delinquencies impoverish the borrower through loan securities seizures, loss of social status and personal integrity, legal fees and penalty charges.
1.2 Problem Statement
MFIs’ survival is largely dependent on the performance of their loan portfolios. This is because MFIs make the majority of their money through interest on loans to small and medium-sized businesses. The loan performance of these institutions, however, is determined by the loan portfolio management strategies used by the institution, including BRAC Uganda Microfinance ltd (Mbabazi, 2012).
Despite the growth of microfinance institutions in Bamenda, there remains a persistent issue of loan delinquency. Studies by Njong and Tabi (2015) suggest a correlation between ineffective loan portfolio methods and rising delinquency rates, pointing to a critical gap in the understanding of factors contributing to this phenomenon. Achua (2015) and Mbah (2018) identified factors contributing to this issue, emphasizing the need for an in-depth investigation into the specific impact of loan portfolio methods on delinquency rates. Addressing this gap is essential for the sustainable development of microfinance in Bamenda thus the reason for the study Effect of Loan Portfolio Methods on Loan Delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Cameroon (Case Study Bamenda II).
1.3. Research Questions
1.3.1. Main Research Questions
What is the Effect of Loan Portfolio Methods on loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II?
1.3.2. Specific Research Questions
To what extent does risk identification and assessment affect loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II?
What is the effect of credit quality analysis Methods on loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II?
What is the effect of performance monitoring and reporting on loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II?
1.4 Research Objective
1.4.1 Main Research Objective
To investigate the Effect of Loan Portfolio Methods on loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II
1.4.2 Specific Research Objective
To find out the effect of risk identification and assessment affect loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II
To examine the effect of credit quality analysis Methods on loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II
To analyze the effect of performance monitoring and reporting on loan delinquency in Microfinance Institution in Bamenda II