THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO ACCESS JUSTICE IN CAMEROON
Project Details
| Department | LAW |
Project ID | LL439 |
Price | 15000XAF |
| International: $40 | |
No of pages | 125 |
Instruments/method | QUANTITATIVE |
Reference | REGRESSION |
Analytical tool | YES |
Format | MS word & PDF |
Chapters | 1-5 |
The custom academic work that we provide is a powerful tool that will facilitate and boost your coursework, grades and examination results. Professionalism is at the core of our dealings with clients
Please read our terms of Use before purchasing the project
For more project materials and info!
Call us here
+237 670787771
Whatsapp
+237 670787771
OR
All human beings and the law have as most cherished finality to attain a state of absolute equality and justice. All of history was a fight for justice but this seems to be an unattainable ideal. To attain this vision it has been imperative to establish it as a preemptive norm where non application is not permissible .To that, a number of international and national human rights instruments have been concluded which Cameroon ratified so applicable in our nation. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the legal framework of protection which in practice are limited because of the political, and socio economic situation climate. Although human rights are entitlement to all persons by virtue of their humanity, the UDHR marks an important turning point in their international recognition. This has become a peremptory norm of customary international law[1].Note should be taken that the right to access justice is a universal right [2]And this document provides ‘‘a common standard of achievement for all people and all nations”[3].It is argued that the constitution is the most vital legal document for a nation that subscribes to the rule of law[4] because it governs the relationship between the people and their government.[5]The constitution of Cameroon is a bundle of bill of rights in its, preamble[6].And pledges adherence to the UDHR, the charter of United Nations and ACHPR and all duly ratified international conventions relating thereto[7].Cameroon been a party to six of nine UN core Human Rights Treaties[8].This is of advantage as citizens can directly invoke international human rights law and urge a national judge to apply directly as the case may be in domestic matters. And as per the constitution duly ratified international conventions prevail over national laws, so a Cameroonian judge can declare any national law as invalid if there’s conflict of law with human rights treaty law. In 1990 the national commission on human rights was created with a limited mandate to make recommendation in respect of investigated cases of human rights violations to the president of the Republic[9].
To this effect all the rights to justice and equality are of great reference to my work. As the Grundnorm of the state and most needed piece legal piece for the nation is a whole Bill of Rights is true because it provides for strong attachment to ideals of justice and equality. As it reads “Affirm our attachment to the fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The charter of the United Nations and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and all duly ratified International Conventions relating thereto, in particular, to the following principles; -Equality, liberty No person may be compelled to do what the law does not prescribe, no person may be prosecuted, arrested or detained except in the cases and according to the manner determined by law. No person may be judged and punished except by virtue of a law enacted and punished before the offence committed; the law shall ensure the right of every person to a fair hearing before the courts. Every accused person is presumed innocent until found guilty during a hearing conducted in strict compliance with the right of Defense, every person has the right to humane treatment in all circumstances under no circumstance shall any person be subjected to torture, to cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment, No one shall be harassed. It shall ensure the equality of all citizens before the law.
All of these aspects of Rights to access justice and equality are great foundation to claim that legal Basis of Protection is strongly rooted. All international convention ratified by Cameroon in domain of ensuring Justice to people equally serve as Guarantees for the right to access justice. As it reads in the constitution “Duly approved or ratified treaties and International Agreements shall follow their publication, override National Laws …”[10].Most of these international conventions shall be of importance to my study. The state shall ensure and guarantee all citizens of either sex with no discrimination the rights and freedoms set forth in the preamble of freedoms set forth in the preamble of the constitution. So all those rights to defense presumption of innocence and Procedural Guarantees shall be made available to all citizens without discrimination. The constitution is one of main source of defendants’ rights. It covers protections from illegal search, seizure, illegal arrest, detention and prosecution, prevents from retrospective effects of the law.
The constitution though the Grundnorm and primary source of all rights (right to access justice) other National Laws provide for protection of rights to justice. These laws are mainly the penal code[11]. Cameroon’s Criminal Procedure code of 2005.[12] Which will be abbreviated and used as CPC here. CPC provides for procedural Guarantees. This CPC is a harmonized form of civil and common law judicial systems. Been a hybrid of those two systems it stands more for the common law principles which is based on the accusatorial system. This accusatorial system [13]of justice unlike the civil law system of inquisitorial lies on the basis of the presumption of innocence. As it reads “any person suspected of having committed an offence shall be presumed innocent until his guilt has been legally established in the course of a trial where he shall be given all necessary guarantees for his defense. The presumption of innocence shall apply to every suspect defendant and accused”. [14] This code proceeds by defining who a defendant suspect and accused are: it defines a suspect as a person against whom there exists any information or due by which tends to establish that he may have committed any offence or participated in its commission.[15] The defendant shall be any person an examining magistrate notifies that he is presumed henceforth either as the offender or co-offender, or as an accomplice.[16] The accused shall be a person who must appear before the trial court to answer to the charge brought against them whether in respect of a simple offence a misdemeanor or a felony.[17] Issuance of court process[18] is a means to avoid illegality and abuse of power by judicial officers in the case of arrest, searches, and so on. These documents have to be shown by any official before arrest,(except in fragrant delicto cases) search or any other proceedings. The various court processes are bench warrants, summons remand warrant production warrant, search warrant, warrant of arrest and imprisonment warrant. Once in police custody which is reduced to a period of within forty-eight hours (48) and therein investigation goes on because suspect still presumed innocent still proven guilty by due process of the later. No bodily or psychological harm shall be caused to the person arrested.
One of the cornerstone criterion for guarantee of right to access justice is the right to a fair trial. This right to a fair trial is a norm of international human rights law designed to protect individuals from unlawful and arbitrary curtailment or basic rights of a person. As it is guaranteed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)[19] under article 14 of ICCPR which provides the <<everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law>>. This goes in streamline with our constitution [20] which in its preamble says all persons have the right to fair hearing and defense. This right to fair trial is applicable both in determining of an individual’s rights and duties in a suit at law and with respect to determining of any criminal charge against him. The word “suit at law” refers to various types of court proceedings which could be administrative. This right has become a non derogable right provided for on Article 4(2) of the ICCPR. The right to access justice having been defined will be examined in two phases. At pretrial and actual trial phase. The right to access justice takes the course of due process of law Justice to be administered is not only during trial but from time of alleged commission of offence , arrest , trial, to subsequent appeal (the right to appeal)[21]..
[1]The UDHR is a declaration that has gained the status of law over the years because of it universal acceptance as law (opiniojuris).Many countries have incorporated it in to their constitution and there is no evidence of its rejection by any country. Many of the right of the right it contains are also customary international law an as such are binding on all subjects of intermational law including those that have not signed and subsequently treaties inspired from the declaration.
[2]Art 8 of UDHR ‹‹everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.››
[3]Preamble of UDHR
[4]Every person is subject to the same laws and no one (however rich or powerful) is above the law principle of equality before the law.
[5] See B.Siegan(1994) Drafting a constitution for a Nation or Republic Emerging into Freedom,George Mason Univ Press pp.72
[6]Unlike that of 2ndjune 1972,art 65 of the amended constitution of 1996 explicitly makes the preamble part of the constitution with the effects that its provisions have same legal force as other substantive articles.
[7]See preamble of 1996 Constitution
[8]See office of High commissioner for Human Rights(OHCHR)at‹http;//WWW2.Ohchr/English/Law/index.htm core≥(last accessed 20/20/2010)
[9]Section 2 of Law No 2004/016 of July 2004 to set up the organization and functioning of NCHRF that repeals Decree No 90/1459 of 8th November to setup The National Commission On Human Right And Freedoms
[10] Art 45 of constitution.
[11] Law No. 67/LF/1/ of June 1967.
[12] Law No. 2005/007 of 27th July 2005.
[13] Section 307 OF CPC‹‹The burden of proof shall lie upon the party who institutes a criminal action››
[14] Section 8 (1, 2 of cpc)
[15] Section 9(1)
[16] Section on 9(2) of cpc.
[17] Section 9(3) of cpc
[18] Section 11 of cpc
[19] International covenant on civil and political rights on general assembly resolution 2200 (XXI) December 16, 1966 enter into force march 23 1976
[20] See above 1996 preamble of constitution
[21]Section 436 of cpc reads‹‹every judgment including that delivered by a military court shall be subject to appeal, unless otherwise provided by law″